[ad_1]
World Well being Group. Most cancers. Retrieved 20 Aug 2021, from https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cancer
Most cancers Analysis UK. Bowel most cancers incidence statistics. Retrieved 20 Aug 20 2021, from https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/statistics-by-cancer-type/bowel-cancer#heading-Zero.
Bray, F. et al. World most cancers statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 nations. CA: Most cancers J. Clin. 68(6), 394–424. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492 (2018).
Workplace for Nationwide Statistics. Most cancers survival by stage at analysis for England. Retrieved 20 Aug 2021, from https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/statistics-by-cancer-type/bowel-cancer/incidence#heading-Three
Brennan, C. A. & Garrett, W. S. Intestine microbiota, irritation, and colorectal most cancers. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 70, 395–411. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-micro-102215-095513 (2016).
Lucas, C., Barnich, N. & Nguyen, H. Microbiota, irritation and colorectal most cancers. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 18(6), 1310. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18061310 (2017).
Huyghe, J. R. et al. Discovery of frequent and uncommon genetic danger variants for colorectal most cancers. Nat. Genet. 51(1), 76–87. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-018-0286-6 (2019).
Steele, S. R. et al. The impression of age on colorectal most cancers incidence, therapy, and outcomes in an equal-access well being care system. Dis. Colon Rectum 57(3), 303–310. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182a586e7 (2014).
Ramai, D. et al. Gender and racial disparities in colorectal most cancers incidence and mortality: A nationwide most cancers registry research. Int. J. Colorectal Dis. 36(8), 1801–1804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-021-03894-x (2021).
Carr, P. R. et al. Estimation of absolute danger of colorectal most cancers primarily based on wholesome way of life, genetic danger, and colonoscopy standing in a population-based research. Gastroenterology 159(1), 129-138.e9. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2020.03.016 (2020).
Cho, Y. A. et al. Genetic danger rating, mixed way of life components and danger of colorectal most cancers. Most cancers Res. Deal with. 51(3), 1033–1040. https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2018.447 (2019).
Choi, J., Jia, G., Wen, W., Shu, X. O. & Zheng, W. Wholesome life, genetic modifiers, and colorectal most cancers danger: A potential cohort research within the UK biobank. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 113(4), 810–820. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqaa404 (2021).
Huang, P. & Liu, Y. A Affordable weight loss program promotes stability of intestinal microbiota: Prevention of precolorectal most cancers. Biomed. Res. Int. 2019, 3405278. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3405278 (2019).
Wilkins, T., McMechan, D. & Talukder, A. Colorectal most cancers screening and prevention. Am. Fam. Doctor 97(10), 658–665 (2018).
Brooke, H. L., Talbäck, M., Martling, A., Feychting, M. & Ljung, R. Socioeconomic place and incidence of colorectal most cancers within the Swedish inhabitants. Most cancers Epidemiol. 40, 188–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2016.01.004 (2016).
Egeberg, R., Halkjaer, J., Rottmann, N., Hansen, L. & Holten, I. Social inequality and incidence of and survival from cancers of the colon and rectum in a population-based research in Denmark, 1994–2003. Eur. J. Most cancers (Oxford, England: 1990) 44(14), 1978–1988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2008.06.020 (2008).
Sarma, E. A. et al. Social integration and survival after analysis of colorectal most cancers. Most cancers 124(4), 833–840. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.31117 (2018).
García-Pérez, J. et al. Residential proximity to industrial air pollution sources and colorectal most cancers danger: A multicase-control research (MCC-Spain). Environ. Int. 144, 106055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.106055 (2020).
Jenwitheesuk, Okay., Peansukwech, U. & Jenwitheesuk, Okay. Gathered ambient air air pollution and colon most cancers incidence in Thailand. Sci. Rep. 10(1), 17765. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74669-7 (2020).
Vermeulen, R., Schymanski, E. L., Barabási, A. L. & Miller, G. W. The exposome and well being: The place chemistry meets biology. Science (New York, N.Y.) 367(6476), 392–396. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay3164 (2020).
Wild, C. P. Complementing the genome with an “exposome”: The excellent problem of environmental publicity measurement in molecular epidemiology. Most cancers Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev.: Publ. Am. Assoc. Most cancers Res. Cosponsored Am. Soc. Prev. Oncol. 14(8), 1847–1850. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0456 (2005).
Ivey, Okay. L. et al. The construction of relationships between the human exposome and cardiometabolic well being: The million veteran program. Vitamins 13(4), 1364. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13041364 (2021).
Wild, C. P. The exposome: From idea to utility. Int. J. Epidemiol. 41(1), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyr236 (2012).
Robinson, O. & Vrijheid, M. The being pregnant exposome. Curr. Environ. Well being Rep. 2(2), 204–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-015-0043-2 (2015).
Wang, Okay. et al. Wholesome way of life, endoscopic screening, and colorectal most cancers incidence and mortality in america: A nationwide cohort research. PLoS Med. 18(2), e1003522. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003522 (2021).
Hastert, T. A., Beresford, S. A., Sheppard, L., & White, E. Disparities in most cancers incidence and mortality by area-level socioeconomic standing: a multilevel evaluation. J. Epidemiol. Neighborhood Well being 69(2), 168–176. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2014-204417 (2015).
Nicolau, B. et al. Shared social mechanisms underlying the chance of 9 cancers: A life course research. Int. J. Most cancers 144(1), 59–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.31719 (2019).
Bergelt, C., Prescott, E., Grønbaek, M., Koch, U. & Johansen, C. Social ties and danger for most cancers: A potential cohort research. Acta Oncol. (Stockholm, Sweden) 48(7), 1010–1018. https://doi.org/10.1080/02841860903036230 (2009).
Ikeda, A. et al. Social help and most cancers incidence and mortality: the JPHC research cohort II. Most cancers Causes Management24(5), 847–860. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-013-0147-7 (2013).
Datzmann, T. et al. Outside air air pollution, inexperienced house, and most cancers incidence in Saxony: A semi-individual cohort research. BMC Public Well being 18(1), 715. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5615-2 (2018).
Porcherie, M. et al. Relationship between city inexperienced areas and most cancers: A scoping evaluation. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Well being 18(4), 1751. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041751 (2021).
Kamath, G. R. et al. The place you reside can impression your most cancers danger: A take a look at a number of myeloma in New York Metropolis. Ann. Epidemiol. 48, 43-50.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2020.05.005 (2020).
Astell-Burt, T., Feng, X. & Kolt, G. S. Neighbourhood inexperienced house and the chances of getting pores and skin most cancers: Multilevel proof of survey knowledge from 267072 Australians. J. Epidemiol. Commun. Well being 68(4), 370–374. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2013-203043 (2014).
O’Callaghan-Gordo, C. et al. Residential proximity to inexperienced areas and breast most cancers danger: The multicase-control research in Spain (MCC-Spain). Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Well being 221(8), 1097–1106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2018.07.014 (2018).
El-Tawil, A. M. Colorectal most cancers and air pollution. World J. Gastroenterol. 16(28), 3475–3477. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i28.3475 (2010).
King, W. D., Marrett, L. D. & Woolcott, C. G. Case-control research of colon and rectal cancers and chlorination by-products in handled water. Most cancers Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev.: Publ. Am. Assoc. Most cancers Res. Cosponsored Am. Soc. Prev. Oncol. 9(8), 813–818 (2000).
Gracia-Cazaña, T., González, S., Parrado, C., Juarranz, Á. & Gilaberte, Y. Affect of the exposome on pores and skin most cancers. La influencia del exposoma en el cáncer de piel. Actas Dermo-Sifiliogr. 111(6), 460–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ad.2020.04.008 (2020).
Monroy-Iglesias, M. J. et al. Pancreatic most cancers exposome profile to assist early detection and inform prevention methods. J. Clin. Med. 10(8), 1665. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10081665 (2021).
Dréno, B., Bettoli, V., Araviiskaia, E., Sanchez Viera, M. & Bouloc, A. The affect of exposome on zits. J Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol.: JEADV 32(5), 812–819. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.14820 (2018).
Daiber, A. et al. The “exposome” idea: How environmental danger components affect cardiovascular well being. Acta Biochim. Polon. 66(3), 269–283. https://doi.org/10.18388/abp.2019_2853 (2019).
Juarez, P. D., Hood, D. B., Music, M. A. & Ramesh, A. Use of an exposome method to know the results of exposures from the pure, constructed, and social environments on cardio-vascular illness onset, development, and outcomes. Entrance. Public Well being 8, 379. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00379 (2020).
Cecchi, L., D’Amato, G. & Annesi-Maesano, I. Exterior exposome and allergic respiratory and pores and skin ailments. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 141(3), 846–857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2018.01.016 (2018).
Juarez, P. D. et al. A novel method to analyzing lung most cancers mortality disparities: Utilizing the exposome and a graph-theoretical toolchain. Environ. Dis. 2(2), 33–44 (2017).
Allen, N. E., Sudlow, C., Peakman, T., Collins, R., UK Biobank. UK biobank knowledge: Come and get it. Sci. Transl. Med. 6(224), 224ed4. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3008601 (2014).
Sudlow, C. et al. UK biobank: An open entry useful resource for figuring out the causes of a variety of advanced ailments of center and previous age. PLoS Med. 12(3), e1001779. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001779 (2015).
Tomita, T. et al. The affiliation between the subjective reminiscence complaints scale and depressive state and cognitive impairment: An element evaluation. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Deal with. 11, 2935–2941. https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S93539 (2015).
Jolliffe, I. T. Principal part evaluation and issue evaluation. In Principal Element Evaluation. Springer Sequence in Statistics, 150–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-22440-8_7 (Springer, New York, NY, 2002).
Mu, Okay., Shi, Q., Ma, Y. & Tan, J. Exploration of entrepreneurship schooling by linear regression and psychological issue evaluation. Entrance. Psychol. 11, 2045. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02045 (2020).
Tran, H., Kim, J., Kim, D., Choi, M. & Choi, M. Impression of air air pollution on cause-specific mortality in Korea: Outcomes from bayesian mannequin averaging and precept part regression approaches. Sci. Whole Environ. 636, 1020–1031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.273 (2018).
Safford, M. M. et al. Variety of social determinants of well being and deadly and nonfatal incident coronary coronary heart illness within the REGARDS research. Circulation 143(3), 244–253. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.048026 (2021).
Baena, R. & Salinas, P. Food regimen and colorectal most cancers. Maturitas 80(3), 258–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2014.12.017 (2015).
Perera, P. S., Thompson, R. L. & Wiseman, M. J. Current proof for colorectal most cancers prevention by means of wholesome meals, vitamin, and bodily exercise: Implications for suggestions. Curr. Nutr. Rep. 1, 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13668-011-0006-7 (2012).
Ruiz-Casado, A. et al. Train and the hallmarks of most cancers. Traits Most cancers 3(6), 423–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trecan.2017.04.007 (2017).
Keum, N. & Giovannucci, E. World burden of colorectal most cancers: Rising developments, danger components and prevention methods. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 16(12), 713–732. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41575-019-0189-8 (2019).
Liang, P. S., Chen, T. Y. & Giovannucci, E. Cigarette smoking and colorectal most cancers incidence and mortality: Systematic evaluation and meta-analysis. Int. J. Most cancers 124(10), 2406–2415. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.24191 (2009).
Savijärvi, S., Seppä, Okay., Malila, N., Pitkäniemi, J. & Heikkinen, S. Traits of colorectal most cancers incidence by schooling and socioeconomic standing in Finland. Acta Oncol. (Stockholm, Sweden) 58(11), 1557–1563. https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2019.1652340 (2019).
Frederiksen, B. L., Osler, M., Harling, H., Danish Colorectal Most cancers Group, & Jørgensen, T. Social inequalities in stage at analysis of rectal however not in colonic most cancers: A nationwide research. Br. J. Most cancers 98(3), 668–673. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604215 (2008).
Doubeni, C. A. et al. Socioeconomic standing and the chance of colorectal most cancers. Most cancers 118, 3636–3644. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.26677 (2012).
Geyer, S., Hemström, O., Peter, R. & Vågerö, D. Training, earnings, and occupational class can’t be used interchangeably in social epidemiology. Empirical proof in opposition to a typical follow. J. Epidemiol. Commun. Well being 60(9), 804–810. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2005.041319 (2006).
Coughlin, S. S. Social determinants of colorectal most cancers danger, stage, and survival: A scientific evaluation. Int. J. Colorectal Dis. 35(6), 985–995. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-020-03585-z (2020).
Godbout, J. P. & Glaser, R. Stress-induced immune dysregulation: Implications for wound therapeutic, infectious illness and most cancers. J. Neuroimmune Pharmacol.: Off. J. Soc. NeuroImmune Pharmacol. 1(4), 421–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11481-006-9036-0 (2006).
Secure and Wholesome Life Knowledgeable. Environmental Causes of Most cancers. Retrieved 3 Sept 2021, from https://www.safeandhealthylife.com/environmental-causes-cancer/#:~:text=There%20are%20two%20main%20environmental%20factors%20which%20can,or%20from%20radioactive%20materials%20like%20Uranium%20and%20Plutonium.
Shanahan, D. F. et al. Well being Advantages from Nature Experiences Rely on Dose. Sci. Rep. 6, 28551. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28551 (2016).
[ad_2]
Source link
