Homelessness plan: Too many questions

Re: “Regional Homelessness Authority plan spurns low-cost solutions, fails our most vulnerable” [March 10, Opinion]:

The truth that the King County Regional Homelessness Authority’s plan is financially unrealistic is compounded by its lack of together with extra life like emergency housing that’s wanted instantly and is more cost effective — housing like tiny homes and emergency shelters. Tiny homes are the favored different in keeping with surveys of homeless folks, but there may be nothing budgeted for them within the KCRHA five-year plan. Why?

I’m a member of a church that has supported a Seattle Housing and Useful resource Effort (SHARE) shelter for a few years. The KCRHA is ignoring a precious useful resource by not reaching out to the non secular group. Why?

It seems to be constructing its personal little fiefdom (paperwork) to compete with King County and Seattle Housing Authorities, different nonprofit housing builders and the brand new Initiative 135 permitted “social housing” developer to create everlasting housing for our unhoused neighbors. Why isn’t its plan targeted on the instant wants of the unhoused and coping with the underlying causes of homelessness?

Alice Woldt, Seattle