[ad_1]
Re: “Of course Seattle is fighting the new drug law” [June 11, Northwest]:
Because the co-sponsors of Metropolis Legal professional Ann Davison’s laws to undertake our state’s compromise regulation on drug possession and use into the Seattle Municipal Code, we object to the parts of Danny Westneat’s column characterizing the “Metropolis Council” as a single-minded monolith that “voted to formally proceed dithering.” Quite the opposite, we launched our laws inside 24 hours of the state passing its model and the council’s vote on June 6 was a detailed 4 to five.
Whereas we recognize Seattle Occasions protection of priorities akin to public security, lumping all 9 independently elected people collectively as “the council” misinforms readers and ignores the varied views of our native legislative department. Furthermore, it minimizes the braveness of particular person motion, akin to Council President Debora Juarez recounting her lived expertise when voting in favor of our laws.
Being particular and clear takes just one sentence: The council members voting to undertake the state regulation have been Juarez, Nelson, Pedersen and Strauss whereas council members voting towards the ordinance have been Herbold, Lewis, Morales, Mosqueda and Sawant.
We’re hopeful future columns will embody a sentence indicating how every elected official voted, in order that readers get pleasure from readability and council members expertise accountability.
Seattle Metropolis Councilmembers Sara Nelson and Alex Pedersen
[ad_2]
Source link
