OMERS, BCI risk reputation hit from Thames Water investments

Article content material

A troubled water utility firm in the UK that counts two of Canada’s greatest public pensions as massive shareholders is dealing with regulatory scrutiny and fines for sewage leaks and will require a monetary bailout.

Article content material

The Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System (OMERS) and British Columbia Investment Management Corporation (BCI) personal 31.8 per cent and and eight.7 per cent of Thames Water, respectively. Analysts at DBRS Morningstar stated in a July 5 report that OMERS and BCI are anticipated to climate the storm with minimal monetary injury given their measurement,  diversification and long-term efficiency — even when Thames Water had been to break down — however there’s reputational threat for the Canadian pensions, which may have an effect on future funding alternatives.

Article content material

Thames Water is the biggest water utility within the U.Okay., serving a couple of quarter of the inhabitants. It’s closely indebted and has confronted monetary difficulties within the face of rising rates of interest. Buyers have been known as on to pony up £1 billion, after injecting £500 million in March, to improve infrastructure and assist handle the £14-billion debt load. Nonetheless, the U.Okay. authorities is now understood to be contemplating a variety of choices to stave off the collapse of Thames Water, together with the potential of putting it right into a particular administration regime that might take the corporate into short-term public possession and end in monetary losses to the present shareholders, in accordance with the DBRS report.

Article content material

Article content material

One in all Thames Water’s massive shareholders, the £90-billion Universities Superannuation Scheme, which has a 20 per cent stake within the utility, has publicly pledged support for Thames Water. It should face questions about its stake in Thames Water from the U.Okay.’s pension regulator, as early as this week, in accordance with a July 5 report from the Monetary Occasions, citing folks conversant in the scenario.

Each Canadian pensions declined to touch upon their function in what is occurring with Thames Water, referring as a substitute to a June 28 assertion from Thames Water Utilities Finance PLC, which stated the utility “is continuous to work constructively with its shareholders in relation to the additional fairness funding anticipated to be required to assist Thames Water’s turnaround and funding plans.”

Article content material

That assertion added that the utility’s regulator, Ofwat, is being stored “absolutely knowledgeable on progress of the corporate’s turnaround and engagement with shareholders” and that Thames Water maintained a powerful liquidity place together with £4.4 billion of money and dedicated funding as at 31 March 2023.

OMERS has been an investor in Thames Water since 2017, following a divestiture by Australia’s Macquarie Group, which later confronted criticism for ratcheting up the debt whereas taking earnings from the utility. BCI has been an investor in Thames Water since 2006.

Keith Ambachtsheer, a Canadian pension professional and director emeritus of Worldwide Centre for Pension Administration, stated the Thames Water case pokes a gap within the frequent characterization of infrastructure investing as an acceptable funding for long-term pension plans and a simple method to generate inflation-linked returns.

Article content material

“Thames Water affords a counter to that view: infrastructure investing can be difficult and dangerous,” Ambachtsheer stated in an electronic mail to the Monetary Publish on July 5.

The rising scandal on the utility has raised questions within the U.Okay. in regards to the technique of privatizing vital utilities.

In one of many newest knocks for Thames Water, the embattled utility was fined £3.3 million on July 4 at Lewes Crown Court docket after a defective storm pump that went unnoticed spilled sewage into rivers close to Gatwick Airport.

On June 27, Sarah Bentley, the CEO of Thames Water, stepped down abruptly. Her exit got here amid studies that the utility’s leakage price was at a five-year excessive, in accordance with a report within the Guardian. Earlier than she stepped down, Bentley forfeited her bonuses but it surely seemed to be too little to dispel rising controversy.

Article content material

The issues at Thames Water have additionally spilled into ESG funds, because the utility has issued round US$3 billion of inexperienced bonds since 2022.

In keeping with a Bloomberg Information report on July 4, greater than 200 ESG funds purchased into these bond points and are left assessing what influence any environmental, social and governance shortcomings on the utility could have on their holdings.

“Investing in water sounds ‘inexperienced’. Investing in a water utility with a protracted record of environmental issues and apparently no credible plan to resolve them isn’t,” stated Ambachtsheer. “The place was the ‘due diligence’?”

The pensions invested in Thames Water might also face questions over the utility’s environmental influence.

• Electronic mail: bshecter@postmedia.com | Twitter: BatPost

Article content material