We Need A Constitution That Means What It Says

By Frank Miele for RealClearWire

Some U.S. senators have famously saved a pocket Structure helpful to make use of as a prop at political rallies; just a few might have even learn it. However at this level in American historical past it not issues whether or not they, or anybody else, can learn the phrases of the Structure as a result of the phrases not imply what they are saying.

Take, for example, the Supreme Court docket’s ruling final week that state legislatures would not have the only real discretion to find out how federal elections will probably be run in these states. As an alternative, state courts are given veto energy over the selections of the legislature.

The mainstream media (and naturally their Democratic Get together allies) celebrated the court docket’s determination in Moore v. Harper that rejected the so-called “unbiased state legislature” idea. The New York Instances known as the idea “harmful.” Vox stated the ruling was a “large victory for democracy.” Those that supported the unbiased state legislature “idea” have been known as excessive, fringe, radical, and worse. In different phrases, they have been Trump supporters.

The one downside is that if the idea is excessive, then so is the U.S. Structure, as a result of irrespective of how a lot the 6-3 majority insists in any other case, it isn’t a idea in any respect. It’s the plain language of the Structure. Test it out for your self.

Article 1, Part 4 of the Structure says particularly, “The Instances, Locations and Method of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in every State by the Legislature thereof; however the Congress might at any time by Legislation make or alter such Laws, besides as to the Locations of chusing Senators.”

It isn’t the governor or the courts and even the individuals of the state which set election guidelines, based on the Structure, however the legislatures. Thoughts you, the state legislatures are usually not totally unchecked of their determination making, however it’s the Congress of the US that gives the checks and balances, not the courts.

Associated: Whoopi Goldberg Demands Constitution Be Changed So That Criminals Can’t Be President

And as for presidential elections, the matter is much more lower and dried. Article 2, Part 1, declares, “Every State shall appoint, in such Method because the Legislature thereof might direct, a Variety of Electors, equal to the entire Variety of Senators and Representatives to which the State could also be entitled within the Congress.”

Discover once more that the Structure provides state legislatures the unique energy to find out the way wherein electors are appointed to vote for president and vice chairman. On this case, even Congress doesn’t have the authority to override the legislatures.

But now the Supreme Court docket has decided that the phrases of the Structure don’t imply what they are saying. That is pure revisionism, and plainly the results of judicial activism. The plenary energy of the state legislatures to make the ultimate determination about federal elections is settled conclusively by the truth that for a few years after the adoption of the Structure, it was frequent in lots of states for electors to be chosen instantly by the legislature with no election in any respect. Not solely did the courts haven’t any say within the matter; neither did the individuals.

We don’t need to defend that follow in an effort to affirm that it’s clearly constitutional, and having stated so, we are able to additionally declare that the Supreme Court docket in Moore v. Harper has not interpreted the Structure, however written a brand new one. If we the individuals determined that it was inappropriate for the state legislatures to make the foundations for the right way to elect federal officers, we might have achieved what the Structure requires and sought to amend it. However as an alternative, attorneys have waged conflict upon the English language and enlisted activist judges and justices to implement interpretations which can be based mostly extra on sentiment than frequent sense.

If we’re being sincere, it isn’t simply loopy liberals who twist the phrases of the Structure to imply no matter they need. Not way back, I wrote a column titled “Do Democrats Value Abortion More Than the Constitution?” It lambasted Biden and others who wish to create a regulation to guard abortion.

As I defined then:

Congress has no such skill. Article 1, Part 8 of the Structure enumerates the powers of Congress. They’re remarkably simple – and restricted. Elevate taxes, borrow cash, regulate worldwide commerce and commerce among the many states, set up a course of for naturalizing residents, coin cash and punish counterfeiters, set up put up workplaces, set up copyright and trademark legal guidelines, set up decrease courts, regulate pirates, declare conflict, elevate armies and a navy, present for calling forth the militia to execute the legal guidelines of the Union, suppress insurrections and repel invasions, and create and keep a small district that shall be the seat of presidency.

Search as you’ll, you received’t discover any congressional energy to advertise social justice or to impose an ethical commonplace on the nation. Sadly for lovers of restricted authorities, Republicans have confirmed to be simply as prepared to trip roughshod over the Structure as their Democrat counterparts. Former Vice President Mike Pence, whom I defended in my prior column, has now publicly known as for a federal ban on abortion after 15 weeks. Irrespective of how a lot you abhor abortion, it’s not possible to seek out any phrases within the Structure which give Congress the facility to manage such a medical process.

Associated: Elizabeth Warren Swings For Washington DC Statehood, Gets Smacked With the Constitution

So no matter what number of members of Congress (or former vice presidents) tuck a Structure of their pockets, it’s also not possible to make them learn it, not to mention be guided by it.

As a remaining notice, I ought to most likely give credit score to the Supreme Court docket for overturning the coverage of affirmative motion in faculty admissions in two separate instances final week. It seems that every one these references within the Structure to equality and equal safety of the regulation really imply one thing. At the very least they do at present. However for 45 years because the court docket’s ruling within the Bakke case, college students who have been rejected for school admission due to the colour of their pores and skin have been simply supposed to smile and bear it. Positive, the 14th Modification prohibits states or state brokers from “deny[ing] to any particular person … the equal safety of the legal guidelines.” However as soon as once more the plain language of the Structure was ignored till final week.

I’d suggest writing an modification that pressured elected and appointed officers of the US to observe the Structure as written, not the one with invisible asterisks and footnotes and a “social justice clause,” however likelihood is it could be discovered unconstitutional anyway – or a minimum of inconvenient.

Syndicated with permission from RealClearWire.

The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content material companions are their very own and don’t essentially replicate the views of The Political Insider.