[ad_1]
Re: “Yes, Seattle, we can have both housing and trees” [Aug. 14, Local News]:
Three options to assist accomplish the objective of offering each housing and bushes for Seattle:
Make an actual cover safety ordinance requiring design approval for multifamily housing on single household heaps to be based mostly partially on how a lot the designs shield present important bushes.
This new ordinance also needs to require that the designs depart enough floor area in order that newly planted bushes can actually take root. Timber can not develop tall and robust when fully squeezed by impermeable surfaces.
Lastly, allowing for multihousing growth initiatives ought to drop the present provision that the developer can construct all market charge, i.e., costly, housing so long as the developer contributes cash to construct moderate- and low-income housing elsewhere. This provision has been used to crowd treeless, lower-income housing into areas of excessive minority inhabitants largely within the south a part of the town and helps to create the mess of harmful cover inequity we as a metropolis now discover ourselves going through.
As a substitute, allowing by the Seattle Division of Building & Inspections ought to require that every multifamily housing venture embrace some lower- and moderate-income housing on the location proposed for growth. This modification would assist present extra cover fairness sooner or later.
Katherine Landolt, Seattle
[ad_2]
Source link
