[ad_1]
Re: “Indigenous leader of Guatemalan protests says they are defending democracy after election” [Oct. 12, Nation & World]:
America wants to face up for democracy in Guatemala essentially the most populous Central American nation on to the south of Mexico.
In August, Bernardo Arévalo received Guatemala’s runoff presidential election in a landslide (58 %). The election was monitored; no accusations of fraud. None. And in early September the Supreme Electoral Tribunal, Guatemala’s excessive court docket, officialized Arévalo’s win.
But the incumbent Guatemalan Legal professional Normal, María Consuelo Porras, is doing every little thing doable to forestall his ascension to the presidency on Jan. 14, 2024.
The rationale? Arévalo is for the life enchancment of the Guatemalan Mayan majority. He’s anti-corruption; he doesn’t need to divert improvement funds to his private wealth or that of his constituents. The banks and firms don’t have their fingers in his pockets, not like his runoff opponent, Sandra Torres.
Protests to demand the Democratic acceptance of his election have been countrywide and ongoing for 2 weeks. Only a few violent outbreaks, simply hundreds of common voters demanding justice.
The place is the U.S., my nation, on this dispute? Is democracy nonetheless a “backside line” or are “we” simply pretending?
Linda Daniels, Seattle
[ad_2]
Source link
